Was John Podesta’s Center for American Progress Designing Disclosure?

Posted on October 26, 2016 · Posted in Disclosure, Exoconscious Citizen

Grant Cameron’s Wikileaks Research on October 26, 2016, cited multiple cc’d emails between Podesta and both former and present staff of his, Soros-funded, Center for American Progress (CAP). Did Podesta’s interest in UFOs and ET Disclosure involve his CAP organization, or was ET a minor personal interest?

beforeitsnews.com

beforeitsnews.com

 

If Disclosure was minor personal interest, why did Podesta tweet on February 13, 2015:

Finally my biggest Failure of 2014: Once again not securing the #disclosure of the UFO Files?   

What was going on down the Hall at CAP?

In 2009, I visited CAP for a public forum on Transparency in Obama White House.

Question: During the CAP forum, were staff down the hall designing Disclosure? After all, CAP was founded by Podesta and developed his primary political policies.

DC Think Tanks are Large Lobbyist Life Forms

DC Think Tanks, like CAP, are Lobbyists. They work for corporate, political, military, intelligence, wealthy donor, religious, and community interests. And they are generously compensated for their policy work.

The DC reality is Think Tanks move issues as focused groups of researchers and scholars get behind ideas and propose policy that becomes legislation then law.

Think Tanks are like a university faculty of corporate-government-donor funded scholars.  Money is the carrot to contextualize research around a given policy intent.

Some carrots, like George Soros who funded CAP, have a stronger power.

As Podesta’s former sister-in-law, lobbyist Heather Podesta, said in FB Interview with Ezra Klein concerning DC, “money changes behavior.”

Institute for Exoconsciousness as Think Tank

A goal of The Institute for Exoconsciousness is to develop a Think Tank to move the issue of ET Experiencers, Exoconsciousness, as a Primary Source of Disclosure. The Institute’s research aim is to focus on the Disclosure information from Experiencers.

We affirm that Disclosure sourced in ET Experiencers, Exoconsciousness, is necessary to empower humans in their innate ability to connect and communicate with Extraterrestrials.

beforeitsnews

beforeitsnews

Government, Military and Intelligence Sourced Think Tank Studies and Disclosure Conferences    

The history of Think Tank and Press Conference Disclosure was primarily sourced in government, military, and Intelligence witnesses.

  • Battelle Memorial Institute: Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14, public October 1955. Cited Here
  • RAND Corporation: UFOs: What to Do? George Kocher, November 27, 1968. PDF Here
  • Brookings Institution: Proposed Studies on the Peaceful Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs, December 1960. PDF Here.

    galacticresonance

    galacticresonance

  • Steven Greer National Press Club Disclosure Project, May 9, 2001. YouTube Here
  • Steve Bassett, Citizen Hearing on Disclosure, National Press Club, April 29 to May 3, 2013. Film Here

Why Disclosure by Exoconscious ET Experiencers?

Question: As Disclosure activists, have we become aligned, one with our Sources, when we perpetually refer to only government, military and intelligence experts for our information on UFOs and ET?

If your answer is Yes, then you need to ask yourself why you chose to narrow your research? And what was accomplished by Disclosure by select testimony from vetted government sources?

If the primary sources of Ufology and Exopolitics are government-military-intelligence, then  have ufologists, in a sense, become their own sources? Are they in a closed information loop

where facts and events are fed by government- military-intelligence and digested as identity?  Mythically, this closed loop is called Ouroboros, the snake eating its tail. Hollywood terms it the Matrix. Science terms it holographic consciousness.

See An Exoconscious Proposal: The Common Ground of Consciousness Science and Psychic Intelligence

Enough Series of Locked Doors  Stories

As Edgar pointed out in his Wikileaked email to Podesta, much of our Government is operating from outdated beliefs and policies that are different from those of the average Ufology-educated citizen.

Fifty years ago Battelle, Brookings and RAND studies on UFOs convinced the government to remove knowledge of the extraterrestrial presence from the citizens of our country. These organizations advised with their best information. However, today much, if not most, of the extraterrestrial reality they examined is known by our citizens. These organizations’  resultant strategies and policies of 50 years ago no longer hold credibility or benefit. 

Five decades of UFO information have dramatically shifted the public awareness of an extraterrestrial presence. And yet, our government is still operating from outdated beliefs and policies. These are detrimental to trust in government transparency, science, religion, and responsible citizenry embracing the next step in our country’s space travel and research.

And yet, once again, we are lured by individuals like Tom Delonge who claims to have the latest and greatest insider UFO-ET information. And get this….it’s scary. According to DeLonge, the Government had to delay disclosure in order to develop sophisticated defense systems against an impending ET attack. See Grant Cameron on Tom DeLonge

Really?  That sounds like a setup if I’ve ever heard one. DeLonge is trumpeting (sorry for the Revelation illusion) stimulus-reaction, trauma creating ET attack. Why?  So our government can bring on the space weapons and corral citizens with neural technological controls.

Human Engineered ET Complexity

I don’t know about you, but I’m weary of locked doors and special access ET Disclosure. We, who educated ourselves through the 70 years of available Ufology, have an idea, not only of the above top secret government UFO-ET information such as Delonge purports to bring forth, but we have our personal UFO ET experience. We have balance.

We are comfortable with the complexity we humans constructed around ET. Heck, we confess we constructed some of our own unnecessary complexity. But we confess our failings and move to another level of awareness about ourselves and ET.

Instead of clumsy complexity and trained trauma, we Exoconscious quickly pick up possible false flag, staged UFO-ET appearances, ala von Braun, designed to scare us into begging for more military technology for space war. No thanks!

The concocted story that ET is invading is false.  If anything, ET is shutting down OUR space invasions. See Robert Salas.

We humans are the evil space invaders. The Terminators. Scripting our own dangerous Independence Day game.

An Exoconscious Alternative

If  you want to play along with the locked doors and above Top Secret plan, then that’s your choice.

But Exoconsciousness is an alternative to re-traumatizing yourself with fears of an ET attack.

Exoconscious are individuals, citizens like you and me, who have matured into their ET experiences. Integrated. Gained wisdom and peace. And we need to open-up and share what we know. Here’s how.

Exoconscious Think Tank   

If you are an ET Experiencer who is a researcher, scholar, we have a seat for you at our Exoconscious Think Tank.

We as ET Experiencers, Exoconscious, will prioritize and develop sane healthy ET -UFO policy that becomes legislation and then law. We will gather as researchers and scholars for the peaceful advancement of all life–planetary, human and ET.

transformation-n5dOur vision is that the ET Presence is and will continue to emerge and emanate on our planet through the coalescence of Experiencer communities sharing ET-Human exoconsciousness for harmonic sustainability and peaceful advancement of life.

Citations

Grant Cameron Facebook Research 10-25-2016      

huffingtonpost

huffingtonpost

One thing that has been overlooked in the coverage of the Podesta/Hillary Wikileaks UFO story is the people who are being copied by John Podesta.

In the emails where John has received UFO questions, he has either copied or asked for input from the following people from the presidential campaign or from the Institute for American Progress that Podesta founded.(One estimate stated that 40% of the high-level officials in the Obama administration came from this institute). Take a close at the names. These are not people off the street.

JPalmieri@americanprogress.org – Jennifer Palmieri is Director of Communications for the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign where she handles she manages candidate message, media relations–and trouble-shooting. She left the Obama administration with Podesta in February 2015.

She previously served as White House Communications Director for U.S. President Barack Obama. Prior to her service at the White House, she served as the President of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

FShakir@americanprogress.org, vice-president of the Center for American Progress (CAP)

dleger@americanprogress.org – Senior Vice President for Communications and Strategy at Center for American Progress

sara.latham@ptt.gov – Chief of Staff to the Chairman of the Hillary Clinton campaign – Special Assistant to White House Chief of Staff John Podesta and Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of Presidential Scheduling from 1996 to 2000

Ken Gude – a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress specializing in civil liberties and terrorism.

Ian Millhiser who is a Policy Analyst for the Center for American Progress, the think tank created by Podesta. Millhiser’s work focuses on government efficiency and transparency.

Steve Bassett’s Paradigm Research website compiles Cameron’s research.

Podesta  Wikileaks here.